Network infrastructure validation of network management frames

ABSTRACT

A detection-based defense to a wireless network. Elements of the infrastructure, e.g., access points or scanning-only access points, detect intruders by detecting spoofed frames, such as from rogue access points. Access points include a signature, such as a message integrity check, with their management frames in a manner that enables neighboring access points to be able to validate the management frames, and to detect spoofed frames. When a neighboring access point receives a management frame, obtains a key for the access point sending the frame, and validates the management frame using the key.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser.No. 13/455,474, filed on Apr. 25, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S.application Ser. No. 12/430,375 filed Apr. 27, 2009, which is acontinuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/029,987 filed on Jan. 5,2005, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No.10/687,075, filed on Oct. 16, 2003.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to wireless local area networks(WLANs) and more specifically to techniques for protecting a wirelessnetwork's infrastructure.

The IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers) 802.11standard provides guidelines for allowing users to wirelessly connect toa network and access basic services provided therein. It has become moreevident in recent years that security and controlled access arenecessities in light of the large amount of sensitive information thatis communicated over networks today.

Traditionally, the security and controlled access efforts have beendirected toward protecting the data content of the transmission and nottoward the prevention of session disruption. In other words, priorefforts have been directed toward protecting the sensitivity of thecontent of the data transmitted and not toward the protection of thetransmission of management frame packets which control the sessionintegrity and quality.

Of course, access to a network can be restricted by any number ofmethods, including user logins and passwords, network identification ofa unique identification number embedded within the network interfacecard, call-back schemes for dial-up access, and others. Theseconventional protection schemes are directed toward controlling theoverall access to the network services and toward protecting the datatransmissions.

Unfortunately, identifying information contained within the managementframes transmitted via a network (e.g. IEEE 802.11 network) has not beenthe focus of protection in traditional security schemes. U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 10/687,075, filed on Oct. 16, 2003, the disclosureof which is hereby incorporated by reference herein, discloses a methodfor protecting the integrity of network management frames (for example802.11 management frames) by providing message integrity checks andreplay protection within a given security context. However, it does notprovide a solution to the specific problem of establishment of thesecurity context. This lack of protection leaves a network vulnerable toattacks whereby an attacker, such as a rogue access point, can spoofAccess Point management frames. For example, a rogue access point (AP)can initiate an attack on one or more stations within a network bysending them a spoofed deauthenticate (DEAUTH) or disassociationrequest, at which point the client will politely disconnect from theiroriginal AP and begin to roam, sometimes roaming to the rogue AP whichsent the spoofed request.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to techniques for detection ofintruders for a wireless local area network (WLAN). An aspect of thepresent invention is the monitoring of management frames, frominfrastructure nodes, such as an access point (AP) monitoring managementframes sent by neighboring access points. Access points provide amessage integrity check (MIC) in an information element (IE), e.g., aManagement Frame Protection IE (MFP IE) to their management frames insuch a way that neighboring access points will be able to validate theauthenticity of the message. This enables neighboring access points todetect spoofed frames and distinguish those access points that areunprotected (e.g. they lack the MFP IE). The present invention furthercontemplates access points configured to implement the methods of thepresent invention and a computer readable medium of instructionscontaining means for implementing the methods of the present invention.

An aspect of the present invention is a method for validating networkmanagement frames. The method comprises receiving a management framefrom an access point, obtaining a key for the access point, andvalidating the management frame using the key. The present inventionfurther contemplates an apparatus configured to implement the method forvalidating network frames and computer readable medium of instructionscomprising instructions stored thereon for implementing the method forvalidating network frames.

Another aspect of the present invention is a method for distributingsignature keys between access points of a wireless network by a securityserver. The method comprises authenticating a first access point andauthenticating a second access point to the security server. The firstaccess point is assigned a signature key used to protect its managementframes. The security server, in response to receiving a request from asecond access point for the signature key for the first access point,sends the signature key for the first access point to the second accesspoint. In addition, the security server can store a list of accesspoints requesting keys for the first access point so that when thesignature key for the first access point is changed, the security serverautomatically notifies the access points on the list of the change. Thedistribution of the signature keys is achieved through a securemechanism.

In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the MFP IEis used to determine which access points are “friendly” or valid, whichaccess points are unprotected, and which access points are rogues.

Still other objects of the present invention will become readilyapparent to those skilled in this art from the following descriptionwherein there is shown and described a preferred embodiment of thisinvention, simply by way of illustration of one of the best modes bestsuited to carry out the invention. As it will be realized, the inventionis capable of other different embodiments and its several details arecapable of modifications in various obvious aspects all withoutdeparting from the invention. Accordingly, the drawing and descriptionswill be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING

The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of thespecification, illustrate several aspects of the present invention, andtogether with the description serve to explain the principles of theinvention.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a network configured to implement variousaspects of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is an example information element for a management frameprotection information element (MFP IE) in accordance with an aspect ofthe present invention.

FIG. 3 is a methodology for protecting management frames in accordancewith an aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a methodology for validating a management frame in accordancewith an aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a methodology for distributing a signature key in accordancewith an aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an access point that is configurable toimplement a methodology in accordance with an aspect of the presentinvention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

Throughout this description, the preferred embodiment and examples shownshould be considered as exemplars, rather than limitations, of thepresent invention. The present invention provides a detection-baseddefense to a wireless network. Elements of the infrastructure, e.g.,access points or scanning-only access points or other components (e.g.,Infrastructure nodes) on the network, detect intruders by detectingspoofed frames, such as from rogue access points. Access points andother elements of the infrastructure include a signature, such as amanagement frame protection information element (MFP IE), with theirmanagement frames in a manner that enables neighboring access points orother network components to be able to validate the management frames,and to detect spoofed frames.

Referring to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a network 100 in accordancewith an aspect of the present invention. The network 100 comprises asecurity server, such as a wireless domain server (WDS), 102 forperforming key management and other security functions on network 100such as authenticating access points 104, 106 and client 112. A wirelessdomain server may be suitably adapted to function as security server 102with the capability to perform the authentication itself, or be coupledto a security server, or authentication server, such as a RADIUS server(not shown), for performing these functions. Access points AP1 104 andAP2 106 are connected to wireless domain server 102 via a securebackbone 108. Backbone 108 comprises at least one of a wired andwireless segment. The example illustrated in FIG. 1, also shows a rogueAP 110. AP2 106 is situated such that it can receive signals sent by AP1104 and rogue AP 110. However, as will be illustrated herein infra, thepresent invention does not require that AP2 106 needs to be in receivingrange of AP1 104 to determine whether packets sent by rogue AP 110 arespoofed.

In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, when AP2 106receives a management frame sent by AP1 104, AP2 106 obtains a key forAP1 104. AP2 106 sends a message on backbone 108 to security server 102requesting the key for AP1 104. Alternatively, AP1 104, upon beingauthenticated by security server 102 can send the key to neighboringaccess points, such as AP2 106, via backbone 108. The management frameis then validated by AP2 106 using the key for AP1 104.

As used herein management frames, such as for an 802.11 network, includebut are not limited to beacons, probe requests, probe responses,association responses, disassociation requests, reassociation requests,802.11 Task Group E (TGe) action frames, 802.11 Task Group h (TGh)action frames, and 802.11 Task Group k (TGk) action frames. Themanagement frame contains an information element (IE), for example anMFP IE, which provides at least a sequence number, a timestamp and amessage integrity check (MIC).

FIG. 2 is an example illustration of an information element (IE) for amanagement frame protection information element (MFP IE) 200 inaccordance with an aspect of the present invention. The MFP IE 200comprises a management frame protection identification (MFP ID) 202 thatis 1 byte in length. The MFP ID indicates that the IE is an MFP IE. Alength field 204 of 1 byte in length is used to store the length of theMFP IE 200. A timestamp is stored in the timestamp field 206, which is 4bytes in length. The timestamp in the timestamp field 206 can beemployed for detecting a rogue AP. If a rogue AP rebroadcasts amanagement frame, or broadcasts a management frame with a copied IE, thetimestamp in timestamp field 206 would indicate the frame is an oldframe, facilitating the detection of a spoofed or otherwise invalidmanagement frame. A replay counter 208 that is 8 bytes in length is usedto store a sequential number to help detect spoofed or otherwise invalidmanagement frames by comparing the sequential number stored in replaycounter 208 with the sequential number obtained from previously receivedpackets. If the MFP IE on a management frame is determined to have, thesame or lower, sequential number as an earlier MFP IE, then a spoofed orotherwise invalid frame would be indicated. A message integrity check(MIC) is stored in the 8 byte MIC field 210. The inability to validatethe data stored in the MIC field 210 using the key for the purportedsource of the management frame would be indicative of a spoofed orotherwise modified frame.

For example, referring back to FIG. 1 with continued reference to FIG.2, when AP1 104 sends a management frame, for example a probe response,AP2 106 receives the management frame and using a key that was eitherobtained from AP1 104 via network 108 or directly from security server102 and validates the management frame using the key. For example, thekey decodes the MFP IE 200 to validate the data in the MIC field 210. Inembodiments employing a timestamp and/or sequence counter, AP2 106verifies that the timestamp stored in the timestamp field 206 is notstale, and/or that the sequence number stored in replay counter 208 isnot the same as, or lower than, a sequence number received in a previouspacket. If AP 106 detects an invalid MIC 210, timestamp 206, and/orreplay counter 208, AP 106 generates an alarm. The alarm is suitably inthe form of a visual, audio, and/or an automatic notification, such asan email to a system administrator.

Referring again to FIG. 1, rogue AP 110, in this example, rogue AP 110is an intruder attempting to pretend to be AP1 104. Rogue AP 110pretending to be AP1 104 sends a management frame, such as adeauthenticate or disassociate message to client 112. If rogue AP 110sends a deauthenticate or disassociate message to client 112, this hasthe potential effect of causing client 112 to roam to rogue AP 110. AP2106, which is in range of rogue AP 110 and capable of receiving signalssent by rogue AP 110, also receives the management frame sent by rogueAP 110. AP2 106 would then attempt to verify the management frame usingthe key supplied either by AP1 104 or WDS 102 over backbone 108. If themessage sent by rogue AP 110 does not have a signature, then AP2 106determines that the management frame is invalid (e.g., was sent by anintruder). If the message does have a signature, e.g., an MFP IE, thenAP2 106 attempts to verify the MIC associated with the message using thekey for AP1 104. If the MIC cannot be validated with the key for AP1104, then AP2 106 determines that the message is invalid (e.g., spoofedor sent by a rogue AP). In addition, if the management frame contains asequence number or timestamp, these are also be verified by AP2 106.

As AP2 106 detects invalid management frames, AP2 106 generates analarm. The alarm being at least one of an email to a systemadministrator (not shown), an auto-dialed message to a systemadministrator, an alert sent to WDS 102, and/or an audible or visualalarm.

In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, WDS 102implements a method for distributing signature keys between accesspoints of network 100. It should be noted that a key established as partof the AP to WDS authentication sequence can then be used to secure thekey distribution sequence. AP1 104 authenticates with WDS 102. AP2 106also authenticates with WDS 102. AP2 may authenticate either before,during, or after the authentication of AP1 104. WDS 102 assigns a firstsignature key to AP1 104. Optionally, WDS 102 assigns a second signaturekey to AP2 106. WDS 102 in response to a request from AP2 106 for thesignature key for AP1 104 sends the first signature key to AP2 106enabling AP2 106 to validate messages purported to be originating fromAP1 104. Other embodiments of the present invention further contemplatethat WDS 102 stores a list of access points requesting the signature keyfor AP1 104. When WDS 102 updates AP1's 104 signature key, itautomatically notifies AP2 106 and, optionally, propagates the updatedsignature key to any other AP that previously requested AP1's 104signature key of the update. In embodiments that have AP1 104distributing the signature key, AP 104 automatically propagates theupdated signature key to access points previously requesting thesignature key.

Referring to FIG. 6, there is illustrated an access point 600 that isadaptable to be configured in accordance with the principles of thepresent invention. The access point 600 comprises a controller 620 and atransceiver 630. Controller 620 comprises a central processing unit(processor) 602, such as a microprocessor, and controls the operation oftransceiver 630. Processor 602 is coupled to memory 604 via bus 603. Bus603 is suitably any type of wired, wireless, or combination of wired andwireless structures capable of transporting data. Memory 604 is anysuitable memory for data storage including hard disk, floppy disk,random access memory, or optical storage. A portion of memory 604contains program code 605 that is used by processor 602. Program code605 is suitably adapted with computer readable instructions for use byprocessor 602 to implement the various methodologies described herein.In addition, bus 603 is connected to transmitter 606 and receiver 608within transceiver 630.

Transceiver 630 comprises transmitter 606, a wireless transmitter.Controller 620 sends data from memory 604, or any other source, totransmitter for wireless transmission via antenna 610.

Transceiver 630 also comprises receiver 608, a wireless receiver. Datareceived via antenna 610 is directed to receiver 608, which performs anydecoding, and stores the received data in memory 604 or any othersuitable location. Although transmitter 606 and receiver 608 are shownas both being connected to antenna 610, in alternative embodimentstransmitter 606 and receiver 608 have their own antenna (not shown).

Backbone transceiver 612 is used to communicate with the network (e.g.,backbone 108 in FIG. 1). Backbone transceiver 612 is suitably adapted toperform at least one of receive and transmit data, and is used toconnect access point 600 to the backbone (not shown) of the network.This enables access point 600 to communicate with other components onthe network. For example, when a management frame is received viaantenna 610 through receiver 608, processor 602 can use backbonetransceiver 612 to obtain the key to validate the management frame.

In view of the foregoing structural and functional features describedabove, a methodology in accordance with various aspects of the presentinvention will be better appreciated with reference to FIGS. 3-5. While,for purposes of simplicity of explanation, the methodologies of FIGS.3-5 are shown and described as executing serially, it is to beunderstood and appreciated that the present invention is not limited bythe illustrated order, as some aspects could, in accordance with thepresent invention, occur in different orders and/or concurrently withother aspects from that shown and described herein. Moreover, not allillustrated features may be required to implement a methodology inaccordance with an aspect the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a methodology 300 for protecting management frames inaccordance with an aspect of the present invention. At 302 a mastersignature key (MSK) is assigned to an AP at the time of AP registration.The key can be updated using a secure protocol, such as WLCCP, availablefrom Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman Drive, San Jose, Calif.,whenever the MSK expires. The expiration period of the MSK is aconfigurable option. At 304 each AP initializes a sequence counter as 1and constructs a unique signature key (SK), for example using the methoddefined by 802.11 Task Group i (TGi): SK=PRF-128(MSK, key protocol, ∥BSSID), where key protocol identifies the type of key protocol beingused and can be any suitable protocol such as SWAN, Smart WirelessArchitecture for Networking, an architecture for radio, network andmobility management within a secure environment, is a proprietary keymethodology available from Cisco Systems, Inc.

The key is then distributed to neighboring access points. The key can bedistributed by a central entity that distributes keys such as a WDS orsecurity server, or APs themselves can distribute the keys toneighboring APs using a secure protocol such as WLCCP (described hereinsupra).

At 306, the AP generates the MIC using the SK. At 308, the AP sends aprotected management or control frame with the MIC IE. The MIC IE can beused by itself or be part of an MFP IE for protecting the frame. Forexample, the AP sends management frames such as beacons,probe/authentication/association requests and responses using a MIC IEor a MFP IE that protects the frames. The MIC IE or an MFP IE caninclude at least one of a sequence counter, and a timestamp. Thesequence counter and/or timestamp increases in order to protect againstreplay attacks. At this point all neighbor APs, WDSs, or any othersecurity server or distributor of keys can generate keys and startdetecting forgeries. APs can advertise this capability either as part ofan IE or using proprietary messaging schemes. The present invention issuitably adaptable to protect multicast and unicast frames originatingfrom an access point, and to detect a rogue access point.

FIG. 4 is a methodology 400 for validating a management frame inaccordance with an aspect of the present invention. As used hereinmanagement frames, such as for an 802.11 network, include but are notlimited to beacons, probe requests, probe responses, associationrequests, association responses, disassociation messages, authenticationrequests, authentication responses, reassociation requests,reassociation responses, 802.11 Task Group E (TGe) action frames, 802.11Task Group h (TGh) action frames, and 802.11 Task Group k (TGk) actionframes. The management frame contains one or more of an informationelement (IE), a robust security network information element (RSN IE),and a message integrity check (MIC). At 402 a management frame isreceived. The management frame can be from any component, such as aneighboring access point, within range.

At 404, a key for the source of the management frame, e.g., aneighboring access point, is obtained. The key is obtained either from asecurity server, WDS or other key management component on the network,or obtained directly from a neighboring access point via securecommunication across a network backbone.

At 406, the management frame is validated using the key obtained in 404.The key is used to decode and validate a signature associated with themanagement frame, such as a MFP IE or MIC. A management frame that doesnot have a signature is determined to be invalid. A management framethat has a signature correctly encoded is deemed valid, otherwise themanagement frame is deemed invalid. When an invalid management frame isreceived, preferably an alarm is generated. Other embodiments of thepresent invention include location determination means for detecting thelocation of the source of the invalid frame, which is transmitted withthe alarm. If the MFP IE or MIC contain a timestamp or sequence number,these are also validated. By using methodology 400, the presentinvention detects spoofed frames or frames sent by potential intrudersto the network.

FIG. 5 is a methodology for distributing a signature key in accordancewith an aspect of the present invention. At 502, a first access point(AP) is authenticated on the network. A security server, authenticationserver, WDS or any component on the network suitably adapted toauthenticate network components on the backbone performs theauthentication. At 504, the first AP is assigned a signature key (SK).

At 506, a second AP is authenticated on the network. As with the firstAP, a security server, authentication server, WDS or any component onthe network suitably adapted to authenticate network components on thebackbone performs the authentication.

At 508, a request is received from the second AP for the signature key(SK) of the first AP. The request is sent from the first AP to one of asecurity server, authentication WDS or any component on the networksuitably adapted to perform key management and/or distribution. Forexample, the first AP sends a message to its WDS for the key, which theWDS either sends back, or in the case of a hierarchical network and thefirst AP belonging to another segment, the WDS obtains the key.Alternatively, the second AP sends a message across the network backboneto the first AP. Preferably, the messages are sent protected (e.g.,encrypted) across a secure backbone. At 510, the signature key is sentto the first AP.

At 512, the SK request for the 1st AP's signature key is stored. Thestored key request would contain an address or identifier of the entityrequesting the SK (e.g., in this example the 2nd AP). At 514, the SK ofthe 1st AP is updated. Updates are initiated when a SK expires,initiated by a network component, such as a WDS, or by a networkadministrator. At 516, the updated SK for the 1st AP is sent to the 2ndAP. Furthermore, any other network component that requested the SK forthe 1st AP (e.g., that is stored as in step 512) also receives theupdated SK. Embodiments of the present invention include sending the keyusing a secure protocol, such as WLCCP described hereinbefore. The keyis sent either by a WDS or other network component responsible for keymanagement and/or distribution or the 1st AP.

In addition to the methodologies described in FIGS. 3-5, the presentinvention further contemplates a computer readable medium with computerreadable instructions thereon for performing the methodologies of FIGS.3-5. A computer-readable medium is any article of manufacture thatcontains data that can be read by a computer or a carrier wave signalcarrying data that can be read by a computer. For example, the means fordefining a plurality of groups of client configurations and means forallocating portions of a network infrastructure to service the groupsmay be distributed on magnetic media such as a floppy disk, flexibledisk, hard disk, reel-to-reel tape, cartridge tape and cassette tape;optical media, such as a CD-ROM, DVD and writeable compact disk; or on acarrier wave signal received through a network, wireless network, ormodem including radio-frequency signals and infrared signals or over awired network (such as an Ethernet).

What has been described above includes exemplary implementations of thepresent invention. It is, of course, not possible to describe everyconceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes ofdescribing the present invention, but one of ordinary skill in the artwill recognize that many further combinations and permutations of thepresent invention are possible. Accordingly, the present invention isintended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variationsthat fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims interpretedin accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally andequitably entitled.

1. A method of operation for an authentication server, comprising:establishing a first secure communication session with a first accesspoint; establishing a second secure communication session with a secondaccess point; receiving a request from the second access point for a keyfor validating management frames sent by the first access point via thesecond secure communication session; sending the key for validatingmanagement frames by the first access point to the second access pointvia the second secure communication session; determining the firstaccess point has changed the key for validating management frames to anupdated key; and automatically sending the updated key to the secondaccess point via the second secure communication session responsive todetermining the first access point has changed the key for validatingmanagement frames to an updated key.
 2. The method of claim 1, whereinthe receiving a request further comprises receiving a plurality ofrequests from a plurality of access points for a key for validatingmanagement frames sent by the first access point via a plurality ofsecure communication sessions corresponding to the plurality of accesspoints; and wherein the automatically sending the updated key furthercomprises automatically sending the updated key to the plurality ofaccess points via the plurality of secure communication sessionscorresponding to the plurality of access points responsive todetermining the first access point has changed the key for validatingmanagement frames to an updated key.
 3. The method of claim 2, furthercomprising storing an identifier that identifies the plurality of accesspoints requesting the key for validating management frames sent by thefirst access point.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the second securecommunication is established before sending the key for validatingmanagement frames by the first access point.
 5. The method of claim 1,further comprising assigning the key for validating management framessent by the first access point.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein atleast one of receiving a request from the second access point, sendingthe key to the second access point, and sending the updated key to thesecond access point is via a secure protocol.
 7. An apparatus,comprising: an authentication server configured to communicate via anetwork to a plurality of access points; wherein the authenticationserver is configured to establish a first secure communication sessionwith a first access point; wherein the authentication server isconfigured to establish a second secure communication session with asecond access point; wherein the authentication server is configured toreceive a request from the second access point for a key for validatingmanagement frames sent by the first access point via the second securecommunication session; wherein the authentication server is responsiveto receiving the request from the second access point to send the keyfor validating management frames for the first access point to thesecond access point via the second secure communication session; whereinthe authentication server is configured to determine that the firstaccess point has changed the key for validating management frames to anupdated key; and wherein the authentication server is responsive todetermining the first access point has changed the key for validatingmanagement frames to an updated key to automatically send the updatedkey to the second access point via the second secure communicationsession.
 8. The apparatus set forth in claim 7, wherein theauthentication server is configured to receive a plurality of requestsfrom the plurality of access points for a key for validating managementframes sent by the first access point via the plurality of securecommunication sessions corresponding to each of the plurality of accesspoints; and wherein the authentication server is configured toautomatically send the updated key to the plurality of access points viathe plurality of secure communication sessions corresponding to theplurality of access points responsive to determining the first accesspoint has changed the key for validating management frames to an updatedkey.
 9. The apparatus set forth in claim 8, wherein the authenticationserver is configured to store an identifier that identifies theplurality of access points requesting the key for validating managementframes sent by the first access point.
 10. The apparatus set forth inclaim 7, wherein the authentication server is configured to establishthe second secure communication session before sending the key forvalidating management frames by the first access point.
 11. Theapparatus as set forth in claim 7, wherein the authentication server isconfigured to assign the key for validating management frames sent bythe first access point.
 12. The apparatus as set forth in 7, wherein theauthentication server is configured to receive a request from the secondaccess point via a secure protocol, send the key to the second accesspoint via a secure protocol, and send the updated key to the secondaccess point are via a secure protocol.
 13. Logic encoded in anon-transitory computer readable medium for execution by a processor,and when executed is operable to: establishing a first securecommunication session with a first access point; establishing a secondsecure communication session with a second access point; receiving arequest from the second access point for a key for validating managementframes sent by the first access point via the second securecommunication session; sending the key for validating management framesby the first access point to the second access point via the secondsecure communication session; determining the first access point haschanged the key for validating management frames to an updated key; andautomatically sending the updated key to the second access point via thesecond secure communication session responsive to determining the firstaccess point has changed the key for validating management frames to anupdated key.
 14. The logic set forth in claim 13, further operable toreceive a plurality of requests from a plurality of access points for akey for validating management frames sent by the first access point viaa plurality of secure communication sessions corresponding to theplurality of access points; and further operable to automatically sendthe updated key to the plurality of access points via the plurality ofsecure communication sessions corresponding to the plurality of accesspoints responsive to determining the first access point has changed thekey for validating management frames to an updated key.
 15. The logicset forth in claim 14, further operable to store an identifier thatidentifies the plurality of access points requesting the key forvalidating management frames sent by the first access point.
 16. Thelogic set forth in claim 13, further operable to establish the secondsecure communication before sending the key for validating managementframes by the first access point.
 17. The logic set forth in claim 13,further operable to assign the key for validating management frames sentby the first access point.
 18. The logic set forth in claim 13, furtheroperable to perform at least one of receiving a request from the secondaccess point via a secure protocol, sending the key to the second accesspoint via a secure protocol, and sending the updated key to the secondaccess point via a secure protocol.